The economy has been sputtering for some time now, and one thing has become clear; fossil fuel costs will continue increasing. Even when power companies put their spin on it, it is obvious that they are finite resources. Whether the remaining supply is good for one century or three, what needs to happen is global energy asset management.
Each nation can make an impact through power reduction and technological improvements, but a global approach is needed. This is complicated, of course, as developed countries use disproportionately more power than developing nations. Attempts at a one size fits all approach are not likely to succeed.
They make a very good point that advanced societies frequently overlook. It is an important concept that must be considered with any effort to plan ahead f or global power needs. Creating a process that works for richer nations only will not solve or even reduce the problem significantly.
The dilemma is that the process of improving the quality of life in poor nations requires power. In everything from infrastructure to food production, fossil fuels play a role. So when developed societies devise a blueprint for power production, it must include the means to distribute it equitably across the globe.
New technologies and improvements are gaining greater efficiencies from solar panels and wind turbines, and are increasing the range of viable geothermal power production zones. However, while the overall costs per kilowatt hour are decreasing these solutions are problematic for developing nations. Some lack the technology to develop them, others lack the political stability.
Even where needed, the capability to use and deploy solar panels, wind turbines and geothermal power collection systems is not always available. For the further progress of civilization a comprehensive approach to the delivery and use of power is essential. By seriously pursuing energy asset management now, the future can remain bright, even in the dark.
Each nation can make an impact through power reduction and technological improvements, but a global approach is needed. This is complicated, of course, as developed countries use disproportionately more power than developing nations. Attempts at a one size fits all approach are not likely to succeed.
They make a very good point that advanced societies frequently overlook. It is an important concept that must be considered with any effort to plan ahead f or global power needs. Creating a process that works for richer nations only will not solve or even reduce the problem significantly.
The dilemma is that the process of improving the quality of life in poor nations requires power. In everything from infrastructure to food production, fossil fuels play a role. So when developed societies devise a blueprint for power production, it must include the means to distribute it equitably across the globe.
New technologies and improvements are gaining greater efficiencies from solar panels and wind turbines, and are increasing the range of viable geothermal power production zones. However, while the overall costs per kilowatt hour are decreasing these solutions are problematic for developing nations. Some lack the technology to develop them, others lack the political stability.
Even where needed, the capability to use and deploy solar panels, wind turbines and geothermal power collection systems is not always available. For the further progress of civilization a comprehensive approach to the delivery and use of power is essential. By seriously pursuing energy asset management now, the future can remain bright, even in the dark.
About the Author:
Read more about The Solution Is Not Drilling More But Energy Asset Management by visiting our website.